A few months ago we visited the grave of Anton Houtepen. It is an unconventional but very moving and meaningful monument: the black stone has a true heart in the middle, a stained glass piece of art with the symbol of the ecumenical movement, a sailing boat, the cross, the symbol ot the World Council of Churches. Like Jesus amidst storm in sea, hope and trust.
The day we visited the grave, was again one occasion when Hans Küng was in the news again because of his protests against the lasting Vatican policy about or rather against debates on celibacy, the central position of Pope and Bishops in the Catholic community. Küng wanted that the Pope should be deposed because of 'Putinism' ruling like the Russian President Putin, as an absolute ruler. What should Anton Houtepen have said about the present state of the Catholic Church, in Rome and in Utrecht?
Also in the field of his first research, the papal infallibility, Küng was more radical than Houtepen. Anton wanted to give it a true and mild hermeneutic interpretation, as a side-step, only to be used in uncontrollable situations the pope should have full authority. But this was for very restricted occasions only. Küng was more radical: he found the whole Vatican I a mistake and the teaching of the infallibility as a wrong decision.
We also passed by other graves in this graveyard. Quite prominent is the memorial for Cardinal Bernard Alfrink. There is also a monument for the very conservative promoter of Latin Liturgy Father Winan Kotte who also had a text in Latin on his grave, ab eterno requisivi Dominum, I have sought God from eternity..
Anton, here in the cold ground of Barbara´s Graveyard waiting for the Great Festive Meal in the end of times? We are not so assured about all these future promises, but with Eelkje and all old friends of Anton we still enjoy the days of Lord here on our earth.